AI Slop Websites
A public library · by Alex Kukharenko

Generated, not designed. AI slop. Catalogued.

Websites that look generated and went live without a single design decision, sorted by industry, by tell, and by the builder they look like. Each one with a dated screenshot, the tells it shows, and a verdict you can dispute.

Report a siteBrowse the library

Send a link. It gets checked against 6 families of tells. If it is slop, it goes in.

  • Public library
  • Sorted by tell
  • Right of reply
  • Zero gradients
  • Purple gradient hero
  • "Elevate your business"
  • Six-finger stock photo
  • Emoji bullets
  • Lorem ipsum in production
  • "Built with Lovable" badge
  • Testimonial from Sarah J.
  • 10,000+ happy customers
  • Buttons that go nowhere
  • No Impressum

Latest specimens

Newest first. Every entry shows the tells it was scored on, so you can disagree with the arithmetic, not just the verdict.

NimbusFlow home page: a purple gradient hero with gradient headline text, two pill buttons, and three icon cards belowDemo
Certified slop

NimbusFlow

nimbusflow.example · SaaS

A workflow tool that elevates, unlocks and empowers, trusted by 10,000 teams that do not exist.

12 tells

The whole library

What is an AI slop website?

An AI slop website is a generated website shipped as finished work without a single human decision: the template's gradient, the model's adjectives and the invented customers all still in place.

Lazy is a choice. Nobody here is angry that a tool was used. Tools are fine. We are angry that nobody looked.

A generated website is a first draft. Shipping the first draft, with its purple gradient, its three identical cards, its testimonial from Sarah J. and its button that goes nowhere, tells every visitor that the business did not care enough to read its own home page. That is what this library collects: not AI use, the absence of a single human decision.

The point is not to laugh at a landscaper with a 25-euro-a-month site. The point is the pattern, and the agencies and founders who sell it as finished work. So entries name the tells, never the people, and every owner can reply on their own page.

  • Tells, not people
  • Dated screenshots
  • Owners can reply
  • Nothing auto-publishes
  • No paid removals

How a site gets in

  1. Step one

    You send a link

    One email, one URL, one line on what gave it away. No account, no form backend, no tracking. Credit if you want it, anonymity if you prefer.

  2. Step two

    It gets checked by hand

    Against 6 families of tells, with points for each and credits for every sign a person made a choice. Three honesty credits cap the verdict at "Lazy, but human".

  3. Step three

    Verdict, page, screenshot

    A dated capture, the list of tells, the score, and the verdict. Owners of named sites are written to first and get a reply box on the entry.

A verdict is an opinion about design decisions visible on a dated screenshot. It is not a statement that a site was made with any particular tool, and never a statement about the business behind it.

The verdict scale

Strong tells count 12, medium 7, weak 3. Every honesty credit takes 8 off. The whole rubric, with every tell explained, is on the Tells page.

  1. Certified slop

    60 points and up

    Strong tells from several families at once. Nobody with design judgment looked at this before it went live.

  2. Suspected slop

    35 points and up

    Enough tells to doubt a person was in charge, not enough to be sure. Could still be rescued.

  3. Lazy, but human

    15 points and up

    A person made choices here. They just made the default ones. Not slop.

  4. Not slop

    under 15

    Plain, maybe boring, but honest. Being simple is not a crime.

Seen one? Send it.

One email is enough: the link and what you noticed.

Every submission is a tip, not a publication. It gets read, checked, scored and, if it qualifies, written up. Most do not qualify, and that is fine.